Transformers : Revenge of the Fallen Review

In a recent review of Terminator salvation the legend that is NeoRanger pointed out that he thought fans were to blame for everything that’s gone wrong with the franchise.

While I don’t think the fan are to blame for Transformers : Revenge of the Fallen, I do think that they are perhaps it’s biggest problem.

Many will moan and bitch about this film because it isn’t what they wanted, I read countless reviews of the first film were the fandom slated Michael Bay for his film and insisted on telling as many people who were willing to read how they would have made a better film.

The simple fact is, even if these people were in a position to make a movie they would never have finished due to them running out of money before they got half way through.
Yes I would have liked to have seen more robot time, but I’m also understand this simple fact; it costs less to put a person on a screen than it does a big fucking robot.

Most people would have spent more money than the film could have ever have made back, it doesn’t take a great deal of intelligence to figure out that whatever way you look at it; that would be bad business. And the film industry is after all - a business; it exists to make money.

So we get Michael Bay who has a track record of exciting action scenes and big bangs. Sure high quality drama isn’t his strong point, but these were always going to be bubblegum movies. Check in your disbelieve at the door, watch, enjoy and don’t think too much about it. Anyone who ever thought they were going to get anything more was deluding themselves, weather Bay was at the helm or not.
And for my money he did a better job than anyone at the criminally mismanaged TCA could have done.

Just because it isn’t what you would have done does not make it a bad film, in fact it’s better than the one you would have done because the film you want will never get made; just fucking deal with it.

So rant about the fans over, on to part two.






If your expecting the drama of Slumdog millionaire.
If you want an epic like Sparticus.
If your hoping for the emotion of The English patient...

...then why the hell did you even bother?
This is Transformers as directed by Michael Bay, all your gonna get is action and explosions.

That’s what Bay does best and he plays to his strengths here. The action is on a grander scale, the bangs are bigger, and there’s an abundance of both.

Transformers : Revenge of the Fallen begins with the Autobot’s and human allies called NEST hunting Decepticon’s in Shang-Hi.
Do they find then and allow for an explosive beginning?
Is the pope a Catholic?

It’s fast and furious as we’re quickly introduced to some brand new characters, Sideswipe, Arcee and the twins.

Straight away we’re given proof that realism has already been left behind, I mean, a Chevrolet
besting an Audi? Never going to happen.
Incidentally the only German car in the film is a bad guy while all the good guys are American? Coincidence? I think not.

Of course the Decepticon’s are quickly dispatched to the pit, but not before the warning is given that the Fallen is making a comeback.

Things quickly move forward to Sam, he’s now a couple of years older and is about to start collage. Him and girlfriend played by Megan Fox (who is little more than window dressing for the duration) are about to be separated. While going through his things Sam finds a small shard of the all spark, you know that box that repairs stuff and shrinks a bit as well as giving life to stuff.

This sets off a chain of events that propel Sam throughout the movie.

However not before Mum and Dad are given their chance to shine, and shine they do. Mum in particular is given some of the films best lines and the actress concerned clearly is enjoying herself.

I could go on here describing the various events of the film, but this is meant to be a review, not a synopsis.

So instead lets look at what’s right and wrong with the film.

First up the humans, who some of you will be pleased to know play less of a role in this film.

Captain Lennox is back, however for the role he plays he may as well have stayed at home; he really is reduced to generic American soldier boy here.

Mind you Megan Fox doesn’t fair much better, she gets some screen time made up to look her best. But apart from her dealings with Wheelie has little to do but look good.

New character Leo really wasn’t needed, in fact he could have been dropped after the final scene in Sam’s dorm; apart from being annoying he brought nothing to the table except point the team towards Simmons which I’m sure they could have done another way.

Ah yes, Simmons. The character from the first film that we all loved to hate. Well while still slightly manic John Turtorro has toned it down a bit since the first film, making it something of a relief when the character comes good at the end.

And apart from Mum and Dad no one else really even deserves a mention.

Of course this is a Transformers film , so I would be amiss if I didn’t mention the robotic characters as well.

Michael Bay has done something here that no one else has done before him, He made Prime a badass. Watch the forest fight and prepare to pick up you jaw from the ground.

Bumble bee also gets his moment to shine, the little guy kicks tail pipe like never before.

Ratchet and Ironhide return but don’t contribute much noteworthy, same as new characters Swideswipe and Arcee.

And the twins are just annoying.

Jetfire is completely changed from his humble beginnings, he is now ancient and altogether a bit all over the place.

Last of all for the Autobot’s is the Decepticon Wheelie who switches sides. Unlike his cartoon counterpart he is likeable and a joy to watch for the most part.

Very few Decepticon’s even get to speak so there’s really not much to say except that Starscream is a delight, exactly like his cartoon/comic counterparts; it’s fantastic to watch the character brought to life.

I should also mention Soundwave, Frank Welker get to reprise one of his signature characters. While it’s nothing more than fanwank I personally feel that any half decent voice actor could have done the job.

Last of all is Devastator, massive and lumbering. It’s a treat to have onscreen even if he doesn’t last long. You can almost see someone at Paramount wondering if it would have been easier to just shovel money into a furnace rather than put the monster in the movie. He’s short scenes alone must have cost a fortune.


The film does have many faults.
The Fallen wasn’t given enough screen time for you to hate him, as such his demise lacked something; you just had no reason to cheer when Optimus sent him to the pit.

There are a few plot holes, and unless I blinked and missed it there still isn’t any explanation of what happened to Barricade after the freeway chase in TF1. Anyone?

Space bridge travel, While TF fans will know all about it; many non-fans will be thinking “WTF - teleportation?” It’s just too leftfield for this movie even if it does serve a purpose.

The annoying characters, not needed; go away.

Most of the humor is provided by the annoying characters (Sam‘s mum and yes! Wheelie being the exceptions.)
Guys who never had girlfriends need not fret though, theres no “Sam‘s happy time” jokes to make you feel uncomfortable.

Far more could have been made of the Decepticon's ripping one of their own apart to restore Megatron.

The biggest problem the film has goes back to my earlier rant. The film makers listened to the fans, and the fans wanted more robots. And here in lies a problem, the same fans will complain about the lack of character development. Well when there’s as many characters as there are in this film all being juggled for screen time to justify the expense of creating them, you going to get almost fuck all character development.

It’s not all bad though, the action and explosions as I’ve already said are what Bay does best, and here he deals it out in spades. There are still some quick cuts and fast editing but it’s not as extreme as last time out. But as I said back then, why was it ok in the Bourne films but not here?

The plot is still almost anorexic but what else did you expect, however the pacing and storytelling are a step up from the first film.

Overall this film does exactly what you would expect it too, it gives you a thrill ride for a couple of hours.
It takes the first film and gives it a shot of adrenalin.
As long as you can check in you brain at the door and don’t over analyse it, it’s a hugely enjoyable movie.
Those who hated the first one will hate this.
But if you enjoyed the first one and you like big fucking robots and all action movies, then go see it; your love it.

TV - A year in review

Why Hello there gentle reader, it's been a while; I hope that your well as you read my humble words.

During my absence the 2008 to 2009 season of shows has drawn to a close, as such I thought it was high time to take a look at the hits and shits of the last year. Oh and I'll avoid too many spoilers along the way.

Terminator – The Sarah Connor chronicles

Terminator TSCC has been a nothing if not a mixed bag. From the odd great episode to the truly piss poor via a generous helping of mediocre viewing.

Season one started badly, there's no other way to put it, however it did improve. I accepted it could never compete with the films if only for budgetary reasons, but all to often it didn't bother to provide anything like an interesting plot.

While the first year did improve greatly the momentum wasn't kept up in season two. The whole three dots theme running throughout this year was poor execution of a bad idea. And the final pay off was nothing short of complete rubbish.

That said the show did offer a few good episodes, the ones centring on Cameron were stand alone and a cut above the rest. Summer Glau proved her acting capabilities time and again. Although what was with shoving her in that swimsuit in the house, it was only a brief moment; but enough to prove she has no figure at all.

One of TSCC's biggest problem was it's main character, Sarah Connor herself, as a viewer I just didn't care about her; I wasn't bothered if she lived or died.

The best character of the year was without doubt Shirley Manson's Katherine Weather. While I felt they gave away her true nature away far too early the mystery behind her agenda was fascinating to watch.

Speaking of characters while many fans hated Riley and Jessie I thought they were welcome additions to the programme as it muddied the waters a bit, true early on they were annoying but the final pay off was well worth it.

So after several bad and mediocre episodes (The ufo one was just painful to watch) in the run up to the finale the show improved dramatically, the final episode itself was a cracker.

Terminator The Sarah Connor Chronicles has now officially been cancelled by Fox, and despite the improvement towards the end of the season it just came too late. If the whole show had been of the calibre of the final three episodes I would be disappointed by Fox's decision to axe the show; as it stands I just didn't care.

Lost

Lost continues to annoy, frustrate and entertain in equal measure.

It is by far the most complex show on television at the moment, and I love it for that. While many of the happenings on the show seen quite daft somehow they manage to pull it off. This is due to them pulling crazy stuff out from the start.

Nothing is simple and every episode leave you hanging.

To call lost an ambitious programme would be an understatement, the shows scope is simply huge.

Season five has been no different, as ever it leave you with too many questions to wonder over.

This year we followed the Oceanic six (Well five if we don't include Arron) ass they tried to return to the Island for various reasons as well as the lives of those left behind. The show at heart has always been a time travel show but this year the cards were really laid out on the table.

It's fast becoming obvious that they have been responsible for their own fates.

To sum up a show like lost in a few words is impossible, the show is too complex to make it worth even trying. However it continues to be one of the best shows on television and all I can say is roll on season six.

Fringe

Before I start I should say I haven't seen the whole season yet, I'm up to about episode 15

Fringe has been another mixed bag, while it hasn't provided any really bad episodes it hasn't been consistently great.

The show has however proven itself to be consistently watch-able.

Like lost there is clearly a bigger overall story but this show goes for a more one story per episode format. Sometimes it works ok, other times it works great.

Fringe's strongest point is the characters, While Olivia may an interesting and flawed lead it by far Walter who makes the show. The actor has great comic timing and overall presents a deeply disturbed character.

While many of the episodes are implausible somehow they work within the shows framework. Not always taking itself too seriously Fringe often allows for jokes at its own expense revealing the tension it build up.

Many shows are still fining their feet during their first season and get stronger as they go onto the second year.

If that's the case with Fringe then I'll will defiantly be coming back for season two.

Dollhouse

Dollhouse was the oddity of the year. It's own premise is it's own problem. When the lead character has a different personality every week how can you ever care about her?

Simply put, you don't.

And this is part of the reason Dollhouse got off to such a poor start. Not only was the lead character Echo completely different every week but her missions weren't all that interesting either.

In fact I almost stopped watching after a few episodes, I'm glad I didn't however. The second half of the season really ramped things up and the show improved dramatically.

While the show itself is an interesting idea the major problem it faces is the main characters (Echo, Sierra and Victor) will change from week to week. The final few episode focused more on what went on behind the scenes and improved the show greatly. It allowed for a much more solid story and therefore much more interesting viewing.

The Paul Ballard characters story moved far too slowly to be of interest, however it was a welcome distraction from the mission of the week. Now his on the inside it will be interesting to see where he goes from here.

The revaluation that a dollhouse staff member was in fact a doll I felt fell a bit flat. It wasn't a big enough deal as the character hadn't had enough screen time for the viewer to care about her.

If dollhouse can keep up the momentum it archived in the second half of its run it will become must see TV, however if it reverts to mission of the week it could also become one to miss; the jury is still out.

Knight Rider

It was painful to watch, I gave up after a few episodes. It's been axed to make way for something else thank god

Prison Break

When Prison Break first hit the screens it was must see TV, however the last two years haven't lived up to the promise of season one and two .

This year Michael and co have been chasing Scylla. A piece of computer hardware with a shitload of useful information on it.

For the most part season four has been watch-able, however it has only been mediocre. It somehow failed to capture the imagination and excitement of the first two seasons; and to be fair. Some of the plot twists were just downright ludicrous.

In fact this year just felt dragged out in many parts, the concept could easily have been squeezed in to just thirteen episodes. Apparently the writes had intended for this years theme to run in season three but the writers strike and short third year prevented that. I suspect that if it had happened both season three and four would have been a lot better for it.

The most criminal thing about Prison Break (pun intended) was the use of William Fincher, while they did use his acting talents they seemed to have forgotten his character. Fincher's Mahone was in season two introduced as a mind as equally brilliant as Michael Schofield's. Why was this forgotten this year as he played a part following Michael's lead all the time?

Prison Break did manage to redeem itself during the excellent finale but by this time it had lost too many viewers, it couldn't possibly have survived. Maybe if there had been no writers strike things would have been different but there was. At least the show got to go out on a high but its a shame that it laboured so much to get there.

24

Jack's back.

24 has always been an ambitious show, to tell a story in real time over twenty four hours is always a challenge.

My question is a simple one though, how come in 24 hours Kiefer Sutherland never needs the loo?

Jack has to answer for his sins, that's the underlying theme of this season. Can it work? That the man we have seen torture and kill can face his own demons?

Damn right it works.

In what is possibly the best season in years 24 shows there plenty of life in the old dog yet.

As implausible as it seemed bringing back Tony Almada was a master-stroke, you never know where he stood of what he was up to, thus making him one of 24's best villains to date. It wasn't till the final episode that you truly knew what his agenda was. It should have been obvious but it wasn't.

The year was filled with drama and suspense, you never knew where things were heading even though the show has a history of characters switching sides you never knew what was coming.

The biggest downside is knowing that there would be another series, whatever happened Jack had to make it through somehow even though he was poisoned with a deadly pathogen. Still that aside may the next year bring on drama like we've seen this year.

Battlestar Galactica

Call it what you want, season five, season four point five, the final season, there are only two words to describe this years outing for BSG, fracking fantastic.

Somehow it worked on almost every level.

The thing about BSG is was never about flash special effects and exciting space battles, it was always about the characters. And those charters are flawed, make mistakes and are completely human.

Last year we were left hanging with the revelation that earth was a nuked wasteland, how could they follow that?

Well follow it they did.

With plot twists and sucker punches BSG was the show to watch this year.

Did you Dee's demise coming? No, neither did I. While she was never a major character she was a constant in the shows support crew. After laying out all the cards for a possible rekindling of her and Lee's romance to shoot herself like that was a shock. One that was brilliantly done, it showed the dispare of the fleet at that time.

The mutiny and the final four were also exciting and excellent story lines, played out with superb pacing.

I've seen on the net a number of people have complained about the second half of the season finale, the religious aspect. My question is did these people even understand the show? It was there from the start, anyone notice season ones “Hand of god”?

This again was played with true skill, it felt natural and gave the story a fitting close.

Every character was given a resolution and all story lines drawn to a definite close.

I've heard it said that BSG is the best show ever. While I'm not sure that I agree I would have to say, it's pretty fracking close.

So there you have it, my thought on this years TV, maybe see you this time next year.

Bankers - Is it spelt with a W?

FIRST thing’s first, as you may have noticed gentle reader I am not one to shy away from the big stories.

It’s time for some Credit Crunch stuff, and what a surprise, the banks have screwed something up! Who’d have thought it, eh?

While this is about the country I live in, is yours really any different?

The people who make sure your cashpoint card doesn’t work when you’re abroad, who write you a £20 letter about your £10 overdraft, have cocked it all up.

No one knows how or why or when — least of all them — but somehow they’ve lost more money than anyone has lost before.

Thing is, when you take a step back and think about it, you realise just whose money it is.

Yes. IT’S OUR MONEY! They lost our money.

Whose money?

OUR MONEY!

So what do they do about it? Long before they apologise, long before they put their own money on a horse and hope it comes in (which is what anyone normal would do, let’s face it) they go to Norman Brown, cap in hand and ask him to help them out.

They say: “We’ve lost a load of money, we don’t know where the money is, help us, please!” (Whose money? OUR MONEY!) And then Gordon Brown says: “Aye, laddies, I’ll help ya oot, here’s a cheque for 70 ballion poonds, that should cover it.” That’s nice and dandy of him, but whose money is he giving them? That’s right, OUR MONEY! So he’s given them OUR MONEY to replace OUR MONEY that they’ve lost.

But the trouble is, he’s not got enough money because it’s been spent on Health and Safety and second houses for his fellow politicians, and so he’s had to borrow some more money.

So he goes to another bank and borrows a load more money, and whose money is it that he borrows? — OUR MONEY!

So he’s borrowing OUR MONEY to replace OUR MONEY, that he’s already spent, to replace OUR MONEY that the banks lost.

And how’s he going to pay off that loan? By raising taxes — which come out of OUR MONEY!

So he’s going to insist we cough up more of OUR MONEY to repay the loan of OUR MONEY needed to replace OUR MONEY the banks need to replace OUR MONEY that they lost. In other words, we pay four times over.

Thanks for that.

But here’s the part that really gets my goat.

I don’t have a goat, but feel like I should buy one just so it can get got.

The banks’ one job is to look after our money — that’s it, it’s not like they’ve got anything else to do, is it? That’s what they do, look after money.

Stick it in a safe, sit a bloke next to the safe, fill up the cashpoint machine as and when. It can’t be hard, can it?

If I can figure it out, why does a bloke who gets a million Pound bonus at Christmas not realise any of this?

Banks look after money, full stop. A bank that doesn’t have any money in it is just a building, the same way a pint without any black stuff in it is just a glass.

What’s worse is we don’t hear the bloody end of it, it’s all over the telly and papers. Ironically it’s the financial experts who are raking it in.

It’s lucky the media doesn’t charge us a tenner every time they tell us the country’s gone overdrawn like the banks do, otherwise we’d have even less money.

I might start it. You’ve got no money mate, there you go, I’ve just provided you with a service.

Please send cheques payable to SharpSpike, c/o Waste your money Inc.

Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's Norman Brown

Gordon Brown has become the first European leader granted an audience with President Barack Obama.

With excitement mounting, we tune in once again to Eyewitness News, Palm Beach, for a special review of this historic meeting.

Good morning, America, how are you? This is your favourite son, Chad Hanging, back with another three hours of news you can use. Our top story this hour is the arrival of the President of Englandland in our nation's capital. Joining me now live from London is our special correspondent, Brit Limey.

Good morning, Chad. I'm standing outside Buckingham Palace, the world-famous home of soccer star David Buckingham and his wife, Queen Victoria.

Great to see, you, Brit. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought President Tony Blair had already met with President Obama at the National Prayer Breakfast a coupla weeks back.

That's affirmative, Chad. But President Blair isn't President of Englandland any more.

He's not? Then what was he doing in Washington?

Beats me, Chad. Perhaps it was something to do with his new role bringing peace to the Mid East.

How's that going?

Pretty good, Chad, if you don't count the war between Hamas and Israel, Hezbollah firing rockets at civilians and the crazies in Iran going nuclear.

So who's the new guy?

He's called President Norman Brown. This isn't his first visit, Chad, he met with President George W. Bush last year.

I must've been watching baseball that day. Funny, I don't remember seeing any coverage of an election in Englandland.

There wasn't any, Chad.

No coverage?

No election, Chad.

How did this Norman Brown get to be President, then?

Some kind of a coup, I guess. There certainly seem to be more armed policemen around these days, and there are surveillance cameras everywhere.

Jeez-o, sounds like a Commie dictatorship.

Feels like it some days, too, Chad.

So why is Norman Brown in Washington today?

He's come to tell President Obama to join his crusade to save the world. He thinks he's Superman and has all the answers to the economic crisis.

Englandland has to be doing real good if this guy thinks he can fix the credit crunch.

Not so, Chad. The IMF says Englandland is worst placed of all developed economies to cope. The currency has collapsed, unemployment is headed towards three million and the country is saddled with £2 trillion of debt, which it will take generations to pay off.

So who's responsible for that?

Norman Brown

Brown's the guy who got Englandland into this mess in the first place?

Affirmative, Chad. When he was Treasury Secretary he encouraged the banks to go on a reckless lending spree which has bankrupted the country, he let public spending rip right out of control, and destroyed Englandland's private pension system, which was once the envy of the world.

Does he admit he screwed up?

Far from it, Chad. He blames America.

He does what?

Blames America, Chad, for selling sub-prime mortgages, which were then bought by banks in Englandland and turned out not to be worth the paper they were printed on.

No one forced these banks to buy them.

No one stopped them, either, Chad. Ten years ago, Englandland tore up the rules designed to stop banks getting into trouble.

Who was the genius behind that cockamayme scheme?

Norman Brown.

So let me get this straight. This Norman Brown guy wrecks Englandland then flies to Washington to tell us that he's saved the world. And he blames America for his own incompetence?

America and a guy called Sir Fred Goodwin.

Who's he?

Ran the Royal Bank of Scotlandland into the ground.

And they made him a 'sir'? Whose idea was that?

Norman Brown. Now he wants Goodwin to lose his pension.

Can he do that?

No, but seeing as Brown's stolen everyone else's pension in Englandland, it won't stop him trying.

So what's happened in Washington then?

There was a formal meeting at the White House, followed by lunch.

Better tell President Obama to count the spoons.

Consumer revenge

Shown below, is an actual letter that was sent to a bank by an 86 year old woman. The bank manager thought it amusing enough to have it published in the New York Times.


Dear Sir:
I am writing to thank you for bouncing my check with which I endeavored to pay my plumber last month.

By my calculations, three nanoseconds must have elapsed between his presenting the check and the arrival in my account of the funds needed to honor it.

I refer, of course, to the automatic monthly deposit of my entire pension, an arrangement which, I admit, has been in place for only eight years. You are to be commended for seizing that brief window of opportunity, and also for debiting my account $30 by way of penalty for the inconvenience caused to your bank. My thankfulness springs from the manner in which this incident has caused me to rethink my errant financial ways.

I noticed that whereas I personally answer your telephone calls and letters, --- when I try to contact you, I am confronted by the impersonal, overcharging, pre-recorded, faceless entity which your bank has become.

From now on, I, like you, choose only to deal with a flesh -and-blood person. My mortgage and loan repayments will therefore and hereafter no longer be automatic, but will arrive at your bank, by check, addressed personally and confidentially to an employee at your bank whom you must nominate.

Be aware that it is an offense under the Postal Act for any other person to open such an envelope. Please find attached an Application Contact which I require your chosen employee to complete. I am sorry it runs to eight pages, but in order that I know as much about him or her as your bank knows about me, there is no alternative. Please note that all copies of his or her medical history must be countersigned by a Notary Public, and the mandatory details of his/her financial situation (income, debts, assets and liabilities) must be accompanied by documented proof. In due course, at MY convenience, I will issue your employee with a PIN number which he/she must quote in dealings with me.

I regret that it cannot be shorter than 28 digits but, again, I have modeled it on the number of button presses required of me to access my account balance on your phone bank service. As they say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
Let me level the playing field even further.

When you call me, press buttons as follows:
IMMEDIATELY AFTER DIALING, PRESS THE STAR (*) BUTTON FOR ENGLISH
#1. To make an appointment to see me
#2. To query a missing payment.
#3. To transfer the call to my living room in case I am there.
#4. To transfer the call to my bedroom in case I am sleeping
#5. To transfer the call to my toilet in case I am attending to nature.
#6. To transfer the call to my mobile phone if I am not at home
#7. To leave a message on my computer, a password to access my computer is required. Password will be communicated to you at a later date to that Authorized Contact mentioned earlier.
#8. To return to the main menu and to listen to options 1 through 7.
#9. To make a general complaint or inquiry. The contact will then be put on hold, pending the attention of my automated answering service.
#10. This is a second reminder to press* for English. While this may, on occasion, involve a lengthy wait, uplifting music will play for the duration of the call.
Regrettably, but again following your example, I must also levy an establishment fee to cover the setting up of this new arrangement. May I wish you a happy, if ever so slightly less prosperous New Year?
Your Humble Client
=0 A

Madonna

When Madonna first moved to the UK, she said she wanted to feel more English. She is now, an unmarried mother with three kids, all from different fathers, and one is black.

Job done.

Canada's biggest export

I have to admit, that when I first bought tickets for Bryan Adams I wasn't too fussed.
In my eyes he was an 80's rocker who was well past his sell by date.

More than anything I had purchased the tickets for my better half who had wanted to see the man preform live, for me as long as he played the Reckless album I'd be happy.

But thats an old album so I wasn't expecting much.

It would be wrong of me before I go on not to mention support band Black Daniel, they were rubbish; don't even bother, I won't.

At bang on 20:30 The lights dropped and the man himself took to a small 6x6 stage in the center of the standing area. Kicking off with just him and an acoustic guitar he launched into "Can't stop this thing we started."

Another song with just the man and his guitar followed by just two words, "Hit it" and the band arrived onstage.

Singing a song I must admit I didn't know the singer/songwriter made his way to the stage as he shock hands and hugged fans en route.

From there on in it was mainly a greatest hits feast, though a couple of new songs did sneak their way into the main set.

Unusually hits like "Summer of 69," "Run to you" and "Everything I do" were part of the main set.
The songs that many people including myself came to hear were put upfront, rather than save a massive hit for an encore he played them straight up. This kind of attitude means you only get an encore if you deserve one.

Surprisingly Bryan made a big deal of his band, a quick search on google tell me he has been using the same musicians for oner 25 years now; and the chemistry really does show during the set. Rather than a solo artist with a backing band it seemed more like a band with the singer as a front-man than anything else.

Indeed guitarist Keith Scott was allowed a blinding extended solo during "It's only love" that far exceeds what was played on the origanl studio version.

Without a doubt Adams knows how to work a crowd, although he had microphones dotted around the stage allowing him to sing in different positions he still moved them closer to the audience here and there. And if he hadn't stood in front of one section of the audience he would just move there. For anyone looking for tips on stage craft Adams serves a great example.

For "When your gone" the singer pulled up a member of the crowd to sing the female lead, ok so she couldn't sing to save her life but you really didn't care; the overall performance still worked.



When the band left the stage you couldn't help but wonder what would be left for the encore, he played his biggest hits in the main set. As I already said, he wasn't getting an encore unless he deserved one; and yes he did deserve one.

Returning to the stage he played "Cloud number nine" followed by a stomping version of "Kids wanna rock."
After that the band left the stage as Bryan Adams was left once again with just him and an acoustic guitar, again he played a newer song I wasn't familiar with before finishing with "Straight from the heart."

And after two hours and twenty minutes he left the stage for the last time.

I said at the top of this I wasn't expecting much from the show. Having attended I can only say this.

WOW, quite simply it's one of the best concerts I've ever been too.

Maybe your a fan, maybe your not. Maybe your a casual fan like myself who just know his hits. Whatever you are if you enjoy live music I cannot stress enough that you should see Canada's biggest export live.